ADA Seeks Legal Action as NDC Registration Sparks Controversy with INEC
A significant controversy has emerged following the registration of the Senator Dickson-led National Democratic Congress (NDC), with the All Democratic Alliance (ADA) raising serious concerns over the legitimacy of the process. Promoters of the ADA allege that the NDC was registered through fraudulent means that circumvented the established guidelines of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
Allegations of Procedural Deviations
During appearances on Arise News Morning Show and Trust TV, Dr Umar Ardo, a key figure in the ADA, criticized INEC for allegedly deviating from its standard procedures by registering a political party that he claims did not undergo the official screening process. Ardo revealed that initially, 171 political associations expressed interest in registration, but only 14 were shortlisted by INEC.
On September 15, 2025, INEC published the list of 14 associations that advanced to the next stage, which involves verification of their offices nationwide. Of these 14 groups, only eight proceeded to the verification stage on INEC’s portal. Ardo asserted that the ADA adhered to all requirements and actively participated in the process, yet was denied registration.
He stated: “It is shocking that a political association that did not submit an application, was not shortlisted among the 14, and did not make the final eight, suddenly appeared with a registration certificate.”
Rejection of INEC's Explanation
Ardo rejected INEC’s explanation that the NDC was registered based on a court order, describing the claim as untenable. He argued that the due process of law would necessitate proper filings and INEC’s participation in court proceedings. “For a court to give such an order, there must have been submissions, and INEC must have been served and represented. We intend to obtain Certified True Copies of the court processes from the Federal High Court in Lokoja to understand what transpired,” he added.
In contrast, he alleged that the NDC was absent throughout all stages of the registration process. Ardo expressed disbelief that a political association that did not apply, was not shortlisted, and did not make the final cut, could suddenly obtain a registration certificate.
Comparisons and Stakeholder Frustration
Ardo likened the situation to awarding a contract to a bidder who did not participate in the bidding process, emphasizing that such actions undermine fairness and transparency in Nigeria’s electoral system. Stakeholders, who invested significant resources to meet INEC’s requirements but were excluded, have expressed frustration over the perceived injustice.
Additionally, Ardo refuted rumours linking the ADA to Peter Obi, asserting the group’s independence and commitment to upholding due process in Nigeria’s political landscape. He confirmed that legal action has been initiated, underscoring ADA’s determination to challenge the registration and ensure accountability.
This development highlights ongoing tensions within Nigeria’s political registration framework, raising questions about procedural integrity and the role of judicial interventions in electoral matters.
