Bode George Criticizes Adeboye's 90-Day Ultimatum for Security Chiefs
Bode George Faults Adeboye's 90-Day Security Ultimatum

Former Deputy National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olabode George, has criticized recent comments by the General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God, Pastor Enoch Adeboye, regarding a proposed 90-day ultimatum for Nigeria's security chiefs to eliminate terrorists or resign. George argued that while concerns over insecurity are valid, such a directive should not be directed solely at service chiefs.

Constitutional Authority and Chain of Command

George emphasized that timeline-based orders fall strictly within the constitutional powers of the Commander-in-Chief, President Bola Tinubu, who bears ultimate responsibility for national security decisions. He explained that Nigeria's military and security architecture operates under a clear chain of command, where strategic directives are issued from the Presidency through appropriate defense channels before reaching service chiefs. Bypassing this structure could create confusion and undermine operational efficiency.

Responsibility of the Presidency

The former PDP leader stressed that setting national security priorities, timelines, and operational expectations rests with the Presidency, not individual service chiefs acting independently. Service chiefs execute defense strategies based on directives approved at the highest level of government. He added that religious and civic leaders have the right to speak on national issues, but recommendations must align with constitutional procedures and the established command structure of the armed forces.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Potential Risks of Ultimatums

According to George, placing strict deadlines like a 90-day ultimatum on security agencies without a corresponding executive framework could be unrealistic and may unintentionally distort coordination in counter-insurgency operations. He cautioned that such demands could lead to confusion within the system.

Background of the Controversy

The controversy follows Adeboye's proposal for security chiefs to have a 90-day window to tackle terrorism decisively or resign. The Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) defended Adeboye, stating his comments were made out of genuine concern for the worsening security situation. The church clarified that the remarks were not intended to undermine the federal government or military hierarchy but to highlight the urgency of addressing insecurity.

Public Pressure and Security Challenges

George's remarks reaffirm that while public concern is valid, security directives must follow constitutional lines of authority, with the Presidency as the proper channel for policy decisions. The discussion reflects growing public pressure on the federal government to address insecurity, as attacks, kidnappings, and violence persist across the country.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration