The Federal Capital Territory High Court in Maitama, Abuja, has postponed its decision on a motion seeking to halt the alleged N2.8 billion fraud case involving former Aviation Minister Hadi Sirika. Justice S.C. Oriji ruled on Tuesday that the ruling on the application will be delivered alongside the final judgment in the substantive matter.
Background of the Case
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is prosecuting Sirika, his daughter Fatima Hadi Sirika, and his son-in-law Hamma Jalal Sule on an amended six-count charge related to contract fraud. The charges involve Al Buraq Global Investment Limited, a company allegedly linked to Sirika's daughter, with contracts worth N2.83 billion.
Defense Application
During Tuesday's proceedings, Sanusi Musa (SAN), counsel for the third defendant, urged the court to stop the prosecution from presenting further evidence. He requested that all evidence and exhibits already submitted be expunged and the charges dismissed. Musa argued that the prosecution initiated the case based on an incomplete investigation and should not be allowed to proceed.
Prosecution's Response
Prosecution counsel Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) opposed the application, citing the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015, which permits the filing of additional evidence at any stage before final judgment. Jacobs noted that both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have upheld the admissibility of additional proof in ongoing criminal trials.
Court's Ruling
Justice Oriji acknowledged that defendants have the right to raise objections before judgment. However, he stated that the issues in the application are closely tied to the substantive allegations. "This motion is not challenging the validity of the charge. However, the issues and prayers in this application are inextricably tied or connected to the determination of the charge. Therefore, in my view, judicial prudence dictates that it is better to deliver the ruling on the motion along with the judgment on the charge after the trial," he said.
The court adjourned the matter until June 10, 2026, for continuation of trial proceedings.
