Lionel Messi and Argentina FA Face Fraud Lawsuit Over Miami Exhibition No-Show
Messi, Argentina FA Sued for Fraud Over Miami Exhibition No-Show

Lionel Messi and Argentina FA Face Fraud Lawsuit Over Miami Exhibition No-Show

Lionel Messi and the Argentine Football Association (AFA) are embroiled in a legal battle, facing a lawsuit for alleged fraud and breach of contract. The case stems from Messi's failure to play in two exhibition matches in Miami this past October, despite contractual obligations that required his participation.

Details of the Contractual Dispute

According to court filings, VID, a Miami-based company specializing in large-scale sporting and music events, acquired exclusive rights to two friendly matches involving the Argentina national team. These matches were scheduled against Venezuela and Puerto Rico in October. As part of the agreement, Messi was contractually obligated to play for at least 30 minutes in each match, unless he was injured. VID reportedly paid the AFA $7 million as part of this deal.

However, Messi did not take the field in either match. For the October 11 game at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami, he opted to sit out, attending the match from a suite instead. This decision was made to ensure his availability for Inter Miami's MLS regular season finale the following night. The lawsuit highlights that his absence violated the terms of the contract, leading to significant financial repercussions.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Financial Losses and Venue Changes

The legal action further claims that the friendly against Puerto Rico had to be relocated from Chicago's Soldier Field to Inter Miami's former home in Fort Lauderdale. This venue change, attributed to low ticket sales according to Chicago Park District spokesman Luca Serra, resulted in a loss of over $1 million for VID. The promoter made the decision to move the match, exacerbating the financial strain on the event organizers.

In an attempt to resolve the issue, the AFA allegedly promised VID a future game against China in 2026 as compensation. However, this proposed match never materialized, adding to the grievances outlined in the lawsuit.

Historical Context of Similar Legal Issues

This is not the first instance where Messi's absence from a match has led to legal action. Last month, Major League Soccer and the Vancouver Whitecaps settled a class action lawsuit. Fans had alleged they were misled by promotional materials suggesting Messi and other Inter Miami stars would play in a match on May 25, 2024. The settlement underscores a pattern of disputes related to player appearances and contractual expectations in sports events.

The current lawsuit against Messi and the AFA emphasizes the serious nature of the allegations, with VID seeking damages for fraud and breach of contract. As the case progresses, it could set precedents for how contractual obligations are enforced in international sports exhibitions, particularly involving high-profile athletes like Messi.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration