Court Rejects Onyejeocha's Bid to Join Forgery Suit, Ogah Wins
Court Rejects Onyejeocha's Bid to Join Forgery Suit

A Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed an application by former Minister of State for Labour, Nkeiruka Onyejeocha, seeking to join a suit filed by Rep. Amobi Ogah against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). The ruling, delivered by Justice M.G. Umar on Monday, April 27, 2026, marks a legal victory for Ogah in the ongoing dispute over the 2023 National Assembly election for Isuikwuato/Umunneochi Federal Constituency in Abia State.

Background of the Case

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CV/1308/2025, was instituted by Ogah to compel INEC to conclude investigations and prosecute Onyejeocha over allegations of forgery of election results. The allegations have been a central issue in the contested election, which was previously adjudicated by the election tribunal and the Court of Appeal, with the appellate court reportedly ruling in Ogah's favor.

Onyejeocha's Joinder Application

Onyejeocha, through her counsel, Legal Assent of Wuse 6, Abuja, sought to be joined as a party to the proceedings, arguing that the matter directly affected her electoral contest and the forgery allegations. However, her application was opposed by Ogah's legal team, led by Umeh Kalu, SAN, of Seasons Law Firm, who contended that the case could be effectively resolved without her involvement.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Court's Ruling

In dismissing the joinder application, Justice Umar upheld the position that the substantive dispute is strictly between Ogah and INEC. The court found that Onyejeocha's presence was not necessary for the determination of the issues at hand. The ruling reinforces the legal principle that joinder is only permissible when a party's rights or interests are directly affected and cannot be adequately addressed in their absence.

Reactions from Legal Teams

Reacting to the decision, Umeh Kalu, SAN, described the ruling as consistent with the law and the facts presented, emphasizing that Onyejeocha's joinder was unnecessary for the resolution of the matter. On the other hand, Onyejeocha's counsel, John Agim, SAN, stated that the legal team would review the ruling before deciding on the next steps, which may include an appeal or other legal remedies.

The case continues to attract attention as it involves allegations of electoral fraud and the role of INEC in ensuring accountability. Ogah's legal team has consistently maintained that INEC must investigate and prosecute any irregularities in the election results presented during the tribunal proceedings.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration